Full Comparison: King Air 350I versus Pilatus PC12 NGX

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

This video compares the Pilatus PC12 NGX and the Beechcraft King Air 350I. The Pilatus PC12 NGX is the latest version of the PC-12 aircraft, which has been successful commercially. The Beechcraft King Air 350I is the newest model in the King Air 350 family. The video discusses the differences and similarities between these single-engine and twin-engine aircraft. The channel also promotes subscribing for more luxury aviation videos, with new videos released 4-5 times a week.

I don’t own the rights to this content & no infringement intended, CREDIT: The Original Source: [source_domain]

King Air 350I VS Pilatus PC12 NGX: A Full Comparison

When it comes to turboprop aircraft, Beechcraft’s King Air 350i and Pilatus’ PC12 NGX are two of the most prominent contenders. Both known for their dependability and high safety ratings, these planes have become popular choices for corporate transport and regional airliner operators. In this article, we will take a closer look at the differences and similarities between these two aircraft, and highlight three interesting facts related to this comparison.

Fact 1: The Interior Design Inspiration
The Pilatus PC12 NGX offers a luxurious and sophisticated cabin experience, influenced by none other than BMW. Pilatus collaborated with BMW Design Works to create a cabin that rivals the comfort and style found in their business jet, the PC24. This partnership resulted in a well-thought-out interior design that can accommodate up to 10 passengers in various cabin layouts. On the other hand, the Beechcraft King Air 350i introduced enhancements to its cabin space in 2008, making it comparable to that of light jets. With added features such as Wi-Fi as standard, the King Air 350i provides a peaceful and comfortable flying experience.

Fact 2: Avionics and Cockpit Environment
Both the PC12 NGX and King Air 350i boast advanced avionics systems. The Pilatus PC12 NGX features cutting-edge avionics found in high-end business jets and is designed specifically for single-pilot use. This advanced cockpit environment allows for enhanced situational awareness and ease of operation. On the other hand, the King Air 350i is equipped with the Collins Aerospace ProLine Fusion avionics suite, which offers touchscreen simplicity. This intuitive system ensures a seamless flying experience for pilots.

Fact 3: Performance and Range
When it comes to speed, the King Air 350i takes the lead with a maximum cruise speed of 312 knots compared to the PC12 NGX’s maximum cruise speed of 290 knots. The King Air 350i also surpasses the PC12 NGX in terms of service ceiling, able to fly at 35,000 feet compared to the latter’s 30,000 feet. In terms of range, the PC12 NGX and King Air 350i are almost on par, with the PC12 NGX having a slightly longer maximum range of 1,803 nautical miles compared to the King Air 350i’s 1,800 nautical miles.

In terms of cost, there is a notable difference between the two aircraft. The Beechcraft King Air 350i has a higher purchase cost, priced at around $8 million, while the PC12 NGX comes in at approximately $5 million. Operating costs also differ, with the King Air 350i costing around $235 per hour to run, compared to the PC12 NGX’s operating cost of approximately $1,280 per hour.

In conclusion, both the King Air 350i and PC12 NGX offer exceptional performance, safety, and comfort. Ultimately, the choice between these two aircraft depends on individual preferences, budget, and specific flying requirements. With Beechcraft’s long-standing tradition of innovation and Pilatus’ commitment to well-thought-out design, both companies continue to provide top-notch options in the turboprop aircraft market.

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

20 thoughts on “Full Comparison: King Air 350I versus Pilatus PC12 NGX”

  1. Operational cost is not only based on fuel cost. It includes at least insurance (and insurance can vary greatly depending on level of skills and experience of pilot) and maintenance cost. There are other variables included in operating costs as hangar, airport fees, recurrent pilot training, etc. When a charter company tells you they will charge you $2000 per hour for example, this cost covers all those expenses plus the revenue or profit for the company or owner.
    And please, cut it off with the “2 engines is safer” (comments). It has been proven that it is not. The drag and unbalance of one propeller running and the other not could be even more dangerous. If en engine stops these planes don’t immediately fall, they can glide for awhile until landing. Not bullet proof but there is a good chance depending on pilot skills. Most recent accidents with pc12 involved pilot error.

  2. I've flown B200, B350C and PC-12 and PC-12NGs building time and honestly both are great but not in comparison with each other. For what it's worth I never felt comfortable doing single engine IFR in anything once in IMC but that being said flying old piston twins was just the same feeling.

  3. Hi guys. I am an ardent follower but you have a mistake on this one. Please review starting at 9:03 min where you compare operating costs. The costs stated on the King Air is $235/hour which is an obvious mistake. Also you did not mention the all field capability of the PC-12, which can allow it to use unimproved airfields to land closer to the destination. KEEP THEM COMING!

  4. i have an open mind after watching your introduction video about the comparison between king air 350I and pilatur pc 12 NGX and i have learned so much from it and i'm sure that your channel will help me to obtain more valuable information to other firlds in the future, thank you for your time and valuable work, have a nice day

Leave a Comment

Skip to content